The Cycle Route Uptake and Scenarios Estimation (CRUSE) Tool
The maps below show combined cycling route network under different scenarios of cycling uptake for three route types: balanced, quietest, and fastest.
Figure 1 Combined balanced route network
Figure 2 Combined quietest route network
Figure 3 Combined fastest route network
The quietest combined cycling route network under the baseline scenario is shown by default. Click on the layers button in the top left of the map to show or hide different layers. The Schools layer, that is hidden by default, shows the location and size (number of students) of the schools in each county. Click here to see the map full screen.
For more detailed definition of the scenarios and the cycling route network types (‘quietest’, ‘balanced’ and ‘fastest’, defined by CycleStreets), see the FAQ.
Other key outputs of the tool include the following, click on the links to see them:
County level statistics
Table 1 presents two indicators on the level of cycle friendliness of the distance cycled by network type under the baseline scenario: (1) % of distance cycled on not hostile segments and (2) % of distance cycled on cycle friendly segments.
Network type | (1) % distance cycled on | (2) % distance cycled on |
Balanced | 27 | 2 |
Quietest | 32 | 2 |
Fastest | 12 | 0 |
aLevel of quietness above 50 (not busy roads). | ||
bLevel of quietness above 75 (which includes quiet streets, shared-use facilities, and cycle paths and park paths). | ||
Figure 2 is an interactive graph that shows the number of cycling trips per day by route distance and scenario in Carlow. The lines on this graph have been smoothed to see what the trends look like.
Figure 2 Number of cycling trips per day by distance and scenario
In Carlow, 23,551 work and educational trips are made each day. Of the trips that are <20 km in length, 10,520 are for travel to work, 5,419 for travel to primary schools, 3,442 are for travel to secondary schools and 1,034 are for travel to tertiary education.
The proportion of work and educational trips made by bike in each electoral division shows the geographic distribution of cycling based on the 2016 Census.
Scenario mode share and distance comparisons
Trips to work
Balanced routes
Quietest routes
Fastest routes
Trips to primary schools
Balanced routes
Quietest routes
Fastest routes
Trips to secondary schools
Balanced routes
Quietest routes
Fastest routes
Trips to tertiary educational establishments
Balanced routes
Quietest routes
Fastest routes
